← Back to blog

OpenClaw vs ChatGPT: What's the Difference?

Two Very Different Approaches to AI

ChatGPT and OpenClaw solve the same problem — giving you access to a capable AI — but they take opposite approaches to get there.

ChatGPT is a centralized service. You use OpenAI's app, on OpenAI's servers, with OpenAI's rules. It's polished, popular, and easy.

OpenClaw is an open-source framework. It runs in your environment, with your data, under your control. Through ekuri, we handle the hosting so you don't need to be technical — but the architecture is fundamentally different.

Here's what that means in practice.

Memory

ChatGPT: Has a memory feature that stores facts across conversations. It's opt-in and OpenAI controls what gets stored. You can view and delete memories, but the system decides what's worth remembering.

OpenClaw: Memory is a core feature. Everything you explicitly ask it to remember is stored persistently in your private container. You decide what's saved, and the data lives in your isolated environment — not in a shared database.

Winner: OpenClaw. The memory is more transparent, more reliable, and entirely under your control.

Privacy

ChatGPT: Your conversations are processed on OpenAI's servers. By default, they may be used to improve models (you can opt out). Your data is mixed with millions of other users on shared infrastructure.

OpenClaw (via ekuri): Each user gets their own isolated Cloudflare container. Your conversations and memory are stored in that container and synced to your own encrypted storage. No other user can access your data. No shared databases.

Winner: OpenClaw. Isolated containers are architecturally more private than a shared multi-tenant service.

Customization

ChatGPT: You can create Custom GPTs with specific instructions and knowledge files. This is limited to what OpenAI's customization UI allows. Under the hood, you're still using the same system.

OpenClaw: As an open-source framework, OpenClaw is infinitely customizable. Add new tools, change the system prompt, modify how memory works, integrate with external services. On ekuri, the most common customization is telling your assistant your preferences — but if you self-host, you can modify the code itself.

Winner: OpenClaw for technical users. ChatGPT for users who want simple customization without touching code.

Available Tools

ChatGPT: Browsing, DALL-E image generation, code execution, file analysis, and third-party plugins (GPT Store).

OpenClaw: Web search, persistent memory, reminders, and an extensible tool system. No image generation (uses Claude, which is text-focused). The tool ecosystem is smaller but growing — and you can write your own.

Winner: ChatGPT has more built-in tools today. OpenClaw's tool system is more open and extensible.

AI Model

ChatGPT: Uses GPT-4o (and variants). You're locked into OpenAI's model lineup.

OpenClaw (via ekuri): Uses Claude by Anthropic. Claude is widely regarded as stronger at nuanced reasoning, writing quality, and following complex instructions. Anthropic's focus on AI safety also means more careful, considered responses.

This is subjective — both models are excellent. But if you prefer Claude's style, ekuri is the way to get it as a persistent assistant.

Cost

ChatGPT Plus: $20/month for GPT-4o access with usage limits. $200/month for Pro with higher limits.

ekuri BYOK: $5/month + your own Claude API costs (typically $5-15/month for normal use). Total: ~$10-20/month.

ekuri Hosted: $25/month, everything included. Comparable to ChatGPT Plus but with a private container and persistent memory.

Winner: Depends on usage. ekuri BYOK is cheaper for light users. ChatGPT Plus and ekuri Hosted are comparable. ChatGPT Pro is significantly more expensive.

When to Choose ChatGPT

  • You need image generation (DALL-E)
  • You want the largest ecosystem of plugins and integrations
  • You prefer GPT-4o's style over Claude's
  • You want a polished mobile app (ChatGPT's app is excellent)
  • You don't care about data isolation

When to Choose OpenClaw (ekuri)

  • Privacy matters — you want your own isolated environment
  • You prefer Claude's reasoning and writing quality
  • You want reliable, transparent persistent memory
  • You want an assistant on Telegram (no new apps needed)
  • You want the option to self-host and own your data completely
  • You're cost-conscious (BYOK at $5/month + API costs)

The Bottom Line

ChatGPT is the default choice for most people, and that's fine. It's good.

But if you care about privacy, want persistent memory that actually works, or prefer Claude as your AI model — OpenClaw (through ekuri) is a compelling alternative. It's a personal AI assistant that's actually personal.

The best part: you don't have to choose forever. Ekuri has no lock-in. Your data is yours. If you want to leave, export everything and go.


Ready to try it? Sign up for ekuri and get your own AI assistant in under a minute. Or read more about what ekuri is and how OpenClaw works.